What are paramilitaries? See ICE.

As a rookie journalist, I hovered on the edge of an enraged crowd. I’d dressed in nondescript clothing and tucked a little cash and my ID into an inside pocket. That’s how I could walk into a far-right, racist crowd that had just beaten another journalist to a pulp on national TV and try to blend in.

Armed thugs on motorcycles circled, scanning the crowd for people like me. I stood near a cluster of men, near enough to be mistaken for a hanger on. They looked me over. I looked at my feet and glanced toward one of the men talking nearby. They moved on.

Once I’d gathered enough data to be able to write my report about the far-right demonstration, I started back toward the little hotel where I was staying. This was tricky because my lodging was in a multicultural part of town, and if those who watched the crowd saw me heading in that direction, my cover could be blown in an instant. Even so, I walked with purposeful strides and forced myself not to glance around or look nervous.

Creative Commons image by Steve Thompson of flickr.com

I was at the foot of a bridge, almost safe, when I heard the enormous crash from the legislative building a few blocks away—glass shattering, what sounded like furniture being hurled from a window and the crowd screaming in a mix of rage and delight. Everyone was turned toward the noise; no one was looking at me. I quickened my pace.

I made it to the middle of the bridge before the machine guns opened fire. Dozens of men in the crowd had semi-automatic rifles that they fired into the air. The sound was like nothing I’ve heard before or since, tapping into primal terror at the core of my being.

Like the chatter of a rattlesnake, that thundering sound was a warning of imminent violence. I ran like hell that night, knowing the nationalist crowd would be on my heels, headed into our multicultural neighborhood to terrorize the minority populations. I reached the entrance of my tiny hotel just as the manager was chaining up the door. He let me slip in beside him, and we heard shots ricochet down the street no more than two seconds later.

That far-right crowd sacked the national legislature and then rioted through a multicultural district destroying property and killing those they found on the street. But instead of being punished, the thugs with those military-style weapons were pardoned and then deputized to deal with supposed “terrorists” in the population, meaning the country’s largest minority. The next few months were marked by violence and terror. As a journalist, I tried to report on the chaos, gathered anecdotal evidence about the families being brutalized and tried to explain to folks back home.

I’ve adapted some of the terminology in this account to American terms, but all of the facts are absolutely true. It was a nationalist riot that sacked the legislature. No one used the term “far-right” there, but that’s what it was. The neighborhood I lived in was called multi-ethnic, rather than multicultural. The deputized thugs were called “paramilitaries” in the international press.

That’s because that was Macedonia, the last war of the breakup of Yugoslavia. It was a country where we expect things like a mob that sacks a legislature and is rewarded with weapons and informal authority to terrorize minorities. In that context, we expect terms like “paramilitaries.”

Listening to the news these days—hearing about a US Senator being forced to the ground and the Controller of the City of New York cuffed and detained by unmarked, masked men without any judicial authority beyond the informal blessing of a nationalist leader, hearing about a pregnant woman, a US citizen, brutally arrested simply because of the color of her skin, hearing about families being rounded up, children torn from their parents’ arms, about people detained in cold or overheated and viciously crowded conditions with little food or water, about sick children taken from their home and country, listening to my neighbors fearfully trade tips on where the paramilitaries were last scene locally, I get flashbacks to that war.

And I understand that we really need to start using the same words we use for these things when they happen in other countries.

When it happens in the Balkans, we call it ethnic cleansing. When the government hands out guns and power to men without uniforms who were previously involved in an insurrection and tells them to get rid of the riffraff, we call them “paramilitaries” and what they do is “kidnapping.” The same words should be used when the same things happen here.

I understand the feeling of dislocation because those things are not supposed to happen here. In truth, such things shouldn’t happen anywhere.

The primary disconnect I encounter, even among people who are dismayed by the heinous policies of the Trump administration, is the constant waiting for when it will “get really bad.” As far as I can tell, that means we’re waiting for a time when life on our streets looks like the set for a WWII Hollywood movie. Then, people say, they’ll be willing to stop business as usual and really do something more than go to the occasional protest. Too many people seem to think we should stay calm and keep on with daily routine unless we see tanks in the streets and clouds of debris on the horizon.

If we do see those sights, it will be much too late to take action. And for most people, even in recognized war zones, things look deceptively normal most of the time. The morning after that mob stormed through our neighborhood in Macedonia, I went out to get a good look at the rubble. Storefronts of minority owned businesses had been smashed. But within a few days that was cleared away.

We lived with the presence of paramilitaries for months, but you rarely saw them, just like with ICE today. They’d show up sporadically. People were afraid but also felt like they might be overreacting. You heard about this or that terrible case a few towns over. There were roads known to be watched by snipers. We drove on them anyway, rolling down our car windows to minimize shattering glass if the vehicle was hit, and yelling to raise our courage. And mostly we got through.

That was war. In areas where the ethnic minorities were a majority, they banded together and resisted. No one internationally thought they were unjustified in using violence to defend their neighborhoods. The nationalists called them terrorists, but the international press said they were just defending their families. The US briefly sent troops to rescue some of them.

The situation in the US right now is being significantly downplayed both by most people who simply haven’t been touched by it personally and by the international press. And the underlying reason for all of this hasn’t even been mentioned.

Let’s consider why there is this sudden enormous push to secure the southern border and deport immigrants. Immigration rates haven’t changed dramatically in recent years. Yes, there are immigrants, just as there were 50 years ago. They still come from the same areas and they still do the same jobs, providing much of the agricultural and sanitation labor in the US. What, other than nationalist scapegoating, has truly changed?

The climate changed. Yes, I mean that literally. The actual climate is changing.

This massive push around immigration—which exploits the proclivities of the far-right, but is actually manufactured by think tanks, right-wing media and the wealthy class of conservative power brokers—is the tell that the intelligencia of the right-wing have accepted that climate change is real. They may still put out disingenuous media playing to the science-denialism of their less educated foot soldiers, but they have accepted its reality. That’s why it is worth it to them to round up the immigrant workforce that makes money for them, detain them and deport many of them.

They can see what is coming. More and more of the immigrants and refugees these days are fleeing climate disaster and climate-fueled violence. Severe drought from global heating affects the attitudes nearer to the equator more intensively than it does more moderate zones. This has made some areas of Central America, northern Africa and the Middle East essentially uninhabitable, especially if you’re poor and lack air-conditioning. At these levels, even just the heat is deadly, let alone the lack of water to grow crops.

And that, of course, puts added stress on already impoverished areas, leading to increased political instability and violence. And it will get worse. As the climate crisis accelerates, thanks to the obstruction and obfuscation of the wealthy and corporations in the US and other “developed” nations, human migration will inevitably increase.

If the current substantial trickle of immigrants and refugees at the US southern border feels flood-like, this is nothing compared to what we are likely to see in the future. As areas nearer to the equator become hotter and drier, people will be forced to watch their families die in desperate misery or risk the violent and perilous crossing. And that is not a choice. There will only be the dividing factor between those who lack the strength to keep striving to live a little while longer and those who give up and die. That’s all.

The migration of humans from uninhabitable zones will not stop. It will grow in the next decade, likely to unprecedented levels. And the current use of ICE as paramilitaries is a response to that. It is also a strategy to desensitize the US population to as-of-yet-unseen levels of brutality and depravity in our country.

What ICE is doing is terrible, but I am concerned that it is actually meant to accustom us to violence against immigrants in preparation for far worse.

Gratitude lessons

Seven fifteen on a Monday morning.

I’ve managed to get the kids up and dressed. I didn’t manage to do my meditation before dawn. It was another interrupted night, but I’m at least half awake.

My fourth-grade daughter is eating her cereal when she cocks her head, frowns and declares, “I forgot about some homework for today. I have to find out about the Age of Gold and tell about it in class.”

We don’t live in one of those kind, gentle school systems with lots of second chances. There are cumulative consequences and my daughter is already struggling. She cares a little but not much, and her multiple learning disabilities make it easy for her to forget. This time she asks for help… nicely for a change.

The kids’ encyclopedias are missing from their places and both claim no knowledge of their whereabouts. I rush to start the computer. She has to leave by 7:30 to get to school in time. And the research info has to be in Czech.

Wait… “The Age of Gold?” I didn’t know there was one.

I do a quick Google search and find dozens of advertisements for gold jewelry, endless gratuitous references to something being “the golden age of …. whatever” and nothing on a historical “Age of Gold.”

“MOM! I’m going to be late!” my daughter’s voice isn’t nice any more.

Creative Commons image by Liz West

I try another type of search. I am sure by now that no one refers to an “Age of Gold” in English histories, but that doesn’t mean the Czechs don’t have one. It could have been the era when royalty in the valley of Bohemia got a bunch of gold for one of those ridiculous crowns that make you pity young medieval kings—for all I know.

“Stupid idiot!” My daughter curses her younger brother in a loud hiss from the hallway, “Get out of the chair! I want to sit there!” There is only one chair for putting on shoes in our tiny hallway.

He shrieks in pain. It’s the standard thing that happens if I’m not there to physically separate them while they get there coats and shoes before school.

And I come unglued.

I tried to help her because she did ask nicely and the consequences of completely blowing off the assignment will be harsh. There are no accommodations for kids with learning disabilities. But I make a massive effort to teach my kids both responsibility and kindness.

My daughter regularly has to do “do-overs”. to speak nicely or do push-ups and squats for hitting and pushing or do “time out” for total freak-outs. She gets the consequences of poor grades regularly and we talk about cause and effect while tucking the kids into bed.

It isn’t the forgotten (or possibly blown off) homework that really gets me. It isn’t even the constant hitting, pushing and general meanness, it is the utter lack of awareness that someone is doing something FOR her. I’ll admit that I’m oversensitive to this at the moment because I find it to be a chronic deficit among the adults in my vicinity as well.

In the environmental organization where I volunteer, we had a crisis a couple of months ago We had several major actions set up but no one willing to volunteer to guide journalists around the site and answer questions. I would have done it myself, except it all had to be done in a language I speak with an accent (and occasionally creative grammar). No one wanted me in that role—least of all me—so I went looking for volunteers with the promise of my presence and support.

Finally, I found a petite young mother who wasn’t in a position to do the major organizing roles or to do direct action—given that she had a toddler in tow—but she was passionate and wanted a volunteer job. So, with a crash course in media relations she went into action. For two months she threw herself into the task. Finally, we had the media issue covered.

But then a competent professional came along. As a journalist, I’ll be the first to admit that he knows his stuff and he’ll likely do a great job. But there was one small problem. He didn’t thank the young woman, who had set everything up for him and held down the fort through those first rugged months. The organizers didn’t thank her for saving our bacon back in August. She was overstepped by the professional and dismissed.

I also worked as a full-time volunteer for two months last summer. I had some time off of work and time when my kids were with their grandmother. Instead of taking that time to write a new book or study medicinal herbs, I threw myself into the struggle for climate justice because it is the burning issue of our times and self-respect demands it of me..

I didn’t go into it because I wanted to be thanked or even appreciated, anymore than the impromptu press spokeswoman did. But I will admit that the respect I felt from other activists for the work I did was a major source of my intense physical and mental energy in those months. It was a much needed boost.

Through the summer, I welcomed, nurtured and trained hundreds of new volunteers. And I have been thanked at times, and once the people in my closest team commissioned a chocolate cake with my name on it when I stepped down as coordinator to give someone else a shot at the role. Thanks isn’t why you do it, but it matters.

As I breathe in the crisp air of late autumn in my withered garden, I discover something unexpected to be thankful for. The power dynamics I witnessed as an activist this time around have given me an unforeseen gift—just the plot twist I needed for a novel outline I’d been stuck with for more than a year now.

I come in with my cheeks burning from the cold, get some tea and head to my writing corner. While last year my writing muscles were exhausted and I could barely get through these blogs, let alone start on another book, I’m ready. Really ready.

That is something to be thankful for.

I am, of course, thankful for the tree just outside my door. I’m thankful for my husband, imperfect as he is who none-the-less means I’m not doing it all alone. I’m thankful that, after long struggle, our children are home. I’m thankful for mostly functional technology that makes the life of a mostly blind person much easier than it otherwise would be. I’m thankful for the literal fruits of my garden, my animals and this first blast of cold winter wind. I’m thankful for the warmth from my radiator and other small luxuries, for the very fact that I can write and my words do not stay silent in a box.

Gratitude is the most necessary element of relationship, even when it is the mere acknowledgement of a helpful presence or a mundane task done well for others. Gratitude is likely at least part of the key that we are missing in our disconnected world.

I am not a vegetarian for health reasons. But I am mindful in the way I eat and live. My thanks goes out to the animals and plants that I need to eat in order to live. And I wonder how the global crisis of meat production might be altered if everyone would take a moment to thank each animal consumed. It isn’t that often or that much for most of us. Many cultures used to do it and that one thing alone, might make all the difference.

P.S. There isn’t an “Age of Gold” even in Czech. She meant the “Age of Bronze”. or the Bronze Age but got her metals mixed up. Another frantic search in which the only purpose was caring for a child as best I can.

Marginalized groups in XR: Will you come or will you go?

Macrocosm

Storm winds are surging within the climate justice movement Extinction Rebellion. Just as in a physical storm the clouds and waves are occupied with their own internal turmoil and any given droplet of water within them is both ineffective and blameless by itself.

In October, a small group in London claiming to be part of Extinction Rebellion mounted an unpopular action, blocking a subway station by gluing themselves to trains and climbing on top of trains during rush hour. The rationale behind such actions is similar to the actions blocking bridges and road traffic. The point there was not so much to be against cars as an unsustainable form of transportation. It was simply to sound a high, loud alarm.

The message of XR blockades is “STOP! Just stop business as usual! Pay attention! There is nothing as important as the climate crisis now!”

The reasoning behind it is that the warnings given by scientists, saying that we have a very limited amount of time left in which we can realistically avert massive disaster and uncountable deaths from hunger, storms and extreme heat, are real.

And we either believe that a consensus among ninety-nine percent of the world’s scientists is a serious matter, that facts are real and the laws of physics actually do apply to us, or we don’t. If we believe those things, there isn’t really any other common sense response than to do whatever it takes to bring about changes that might just be able to save millions of lives.

Photo by Arie Farnam

That’s the intention. Extinction Rebellion hasn’t distanced from the group of activists who carried out the London subway blockade because the rules of the movement are also real. If someone subscribes to the ten principles of XR, including non-violence, refraining from shaming, mutual support and challenging power structures, they can call themselves Extinction Rebellion. That is what the London subway blockaders did.

But the vast majority of XR members voiced vehement objections to the action. Some simply felt that the movement shouldn’t target reasonably carbon-light transportation alternatives, such as rail transport of any kind. After all, subways and light rail are the kind of things we need to be moving toward, even if Extinction Rebellion refuses to put out exact specifications for solutions.

The movement insists that a people’s assembly—chosen through a jury system, rather than through a heavily financed election—should decide how we move forward to solve the climate crisis. But rail transport is one of the non-controversial assumptions about what that solution will have to entail.

Others have more complex reasons for their complaints. The trains blocked in this particular action happened to come from some of the poorest parts of London, full of immigrants and ethnic minorities on the way to minimum wage jobs with harsh tardiness policies.

Extinction Rebellion is not immune to the accusations leveled at most environmental organizations that it’s a place for middle-class white people to work out their rebellious streak and generalized anxiety. Extinction Rebellion has made an effort since the beginning to keep a permanent focus on inclusion, but this action felt like a slap in the face to a lot of people of color.

One of the ten XR principles is “We accept everyone and every part of everyone.” It’s supposed to be inclusive and the small print talks about inclusion of every kind of vulnerable group. But some people of color have expressed that they don’t feel nice and cozy and safe when they hear this principle. Instead they immediately wonder if the white supremacist parts of some people might be included in that blanket acceptance statement.

There are other principles that point toward inclusion and much of the in-depth but technically non-binding structural documents that make up the DYI systems to set up XR branches in every city around the world go into detail about cultural sensitivity, inclusion and recognizing the different experience with police that people in vulnerable groups may have. Extinction Rebellion tries, but it is still an attempt at sensitivity by a bunch of white people.

“Rebels”. (as XR members call themselves) have employed a popular chant over the past year when police intervene to force an end to a blockade. “Police, we love you! We do this for your children!” has echoed in every English speaking country as well as quite a few where the words are foreign. In Prague, the Czech rebels at our October blockade yelled it in thickly accented English, while police hauled away 130 of our friends, injuring some.

And yet, black people back in the UK, where Extinction Rebellion started, and across the water in the US have said essentially, “Ahem, that’s not going to work for us.” Love just isn’t happening in the relationship between black people and the police in the UK or the US, where random police interactions with black people wind up with way too many black people dead. Most black rebels in these countries are not even sitting on the blockades and getting arrested.

While white rebels risk a night in jail, a fine and a misdemeanor record, black people risk their lives just walking or driving, let alone poking the police bear. It is less that black rebels don’t want to say the chant as it is that it sounds like white people wallowing in white privilege.

Now, after the Autumn Rebellion, many XR groups online and off are tackling the issue of inclusion. I’m glad they are because I see this as the Achille’s heel of this movement, which has achieved a great deal in one short year. If Extinction Rebellion fails to fuel massive public demand for climate justice at every political level, it will be because we fail the inclusion part.

That isn’t just because we should be good people or that we need the numbers that vulnerable groups could provide by joining us. It is most importantly at the core of what has made XR successful so far. We should include people of color, people with disabilities and all the other vulnerable groups not for their sake, but for everyone’s sake. Everyone has some vulnerability and it is when we see those more vulnerable than us truly included that we can fully commit our energy, time and resources to this kind of effort. Inclusion isn’t just for those we shouldn’t exclude.

When it is there, it permeates the entire culture. When it isn’t there, no one is safe, and social interactions are a constant battle of individuals trying to stay in the center of the herd, furthest from exclusion.

Microcosm

When I first joined XR, I was glad to find that no one made much of my disability. They were happy to try to accommodate my vision impairment by letting me know who was who, and I was so grateful to be treated a bit better than the immediate social stereotyping and dismissal that I encounter on a daily basis in society.

But as time went on and more and more people joined XR, I have watched that early focus on inclusion fade and thin. New people often come from a non-activist environment and they bring with them the exclusionist assumptions of the wider society. Those who have been there longer are tired and desperate to reach some kind of tangible goal. Inclusion starts to feel like a luxury we can’t afford.

I have been reticent to write openly about the difficulties I’ve run into with exclusion within XR over the past few months, because i too am focused on the ultimate goal. But the events of recent weeks around the world have convinced me that we must talk about these things openly. Because it is exclusion that will take us down.

It is not a luxury. It’s the heart of the matter.

There may be a few exceptions, but by and large the people who join XR are open-minded and informed. They are people who believe in science enough to put their regular lives on hold and do something about a crisis that for most of us—in white-majority countries at least—is still largely theoretical. They are also demonstrably people who take personal responsibility and eschew laziness, because rather than simply talking about the crisis, they are doing something.

These factors mean that even though XR has people from both the political left and the political right, most are already tolerant, nice people. They don’t think of themselves as racist, ablest or otherwise exclusionist. Many even consider themselves actively anti-racist or anti-ableist. And a lot of them feel like this should be enough.

But as with the London subway blockade and the police chant, it clearly isn’t. For me, as the only significantly disabled person in my local XR group, I have to agree. My group has been wonderful in consciously working to include me. I truly appreciate that, and yet I know that most people with disabilities in my place would have left long ago and I am constantly close to leaving the group myself.

I asked a friend who uses a wheelchair to join and she just laughed ruefully. I couldn’t really argue. The group says they want a person in a wheelchair at the blockades because it would make for good press photos, but no one has ever even mentioned the fact that we’ve never held a meeting in a place that was even remotely wheelchair accessible. They want a person with a wheelchair as a prop, not as an organizer.

There are two categories of issues I can identify that cause me to feel excluded in the group even without the issue of physical accessibility. which given the conditions isn’t really their fault.

First, there is a tolerance for intolerance, as that principle about accepting all parts of everyone implies. While most people are inclusive and welcoming, there are those who are not and the group not only tolerates them but insists that I must tolerate them. If I speak up, even very discretely about exclusion and hate directed toward me, I am told that the urgency of our goal demands that I tolerate it and don’t rock the boat.

Second, there is a lack of understanding about the effects that exclusion in the wider society have had on me and a marked lack of tolerance for any reaction I have to social exclusion.

In one prominent example, a person in a position of power in my group decided early on that she did not like me. Her explanation focused primarily on communication issues, specifically that some of my texts were too long. Being a writer, I can be a bit wordy, but when I can, I go back and edit. Written communication usually isn’t a problem for me.

But in this case, we were using a phone app for daily communication within the group. I can’t type on the tiny phone screen very well because it is too small for me to see, so I was dictating my texts. This meant that my texts were especially long. When we speak, we naturally use more words than when we write. To add to this, editing on my phone in extremely small print is next to impossible for me. Yes, blind people use audio interfaces that make it technically doable but it is excruciatingly slow. Sometimes i do spend literally hours editing a few texts for the group to make things readable. But most of the time, with my work, household, children and all, I didn’t have time. I just dictated texts and sent them, oral vagueness and all.

So, the dislike this person initially developed toward me was based on something that was a symptom of my disability. She is a person steeped in European good manners and social justice thinking. I am certain that she would never intentionally exclude a person over a disability or some other irrelevant trait. But she did—likely obliviously—develop her antipathy for me over something that was part of my disability.

She and the rest of the group chose to call it “a difference in communication styles,” and despite my explanations, refuse to see it as disability related or reconsider her conclusions. When she initially adopted her negative view of me, I was utterly confused. We had, only one day before, had a wonderful conversation in which she told me that I would be working with her closely and expressed a lot of support for my work in the organization. And then suddenly, I was cut off from communications and told that she no longer wanted to work with me.

She later said that my reaction shocked her. After a lifetime of social rejection and even complete isolation for years at a time, I don’t take abrupt, unexplained rejection well. My first reaction was to cry, then to try to defend myself and later to bargain. For so many people with disabilities social rejection is a real visceral danger and I am no exception in that.

It is understandable then that my reaction came across as out-of-proportion and overly pushy to someone who felt she was simply setting some boundaries with an annoying individual who writes overly long texts.

But here’s the thing. After many months of informal exclusion, I was forced to accept an agreement in which we would be sensitive in our communications with each other and I would stay away from powerful roles within the organization in order to minimize contact between me and this person in power. This was the only way i could stay in the group at all.

That may sound like a reasonable compromise, and it did to most of the local XR rebels. But imagine if this had been a black person instead of a person with a disability. Imagine that someone expressed dislike of a black person because of the way they spoke or dressed or some other cultural attribute and started excluding that person. Imagine then—it isn’t hard at all—that the black person got intense and up in that person’s face because they have been excluded and dismissed way too often by white people, and subsequently that the those in power limited the black person to low-level roles as a means to avoid further conflict.

Realistically, most black people—and most people with disabilities—would not get intense. They’d just leave. That is ONE of those reasons that there are so few people from marginalized groups in XR and similar organizations. But it is not at all difficult to imagine this scenario, because like me, some black people stay and fight.

Now, in the scenario with the black person most anti-racist white people are now educated enough to see the problem and to call this exclusion. We aren’t perfect yet and i’m sure this does happen in Extinction Rebellion to black people. But very few abled people are informed enough to see the same situation clearly when the issue is disability. For whatever reason, that’s just the dynamic.

The end result is that, if I want to continue to be part of Extinction Rebellion, I have to constantly bump up against the antagonistic walls set for me, where I am not allowed to take on national roles in the group. And I have to constantly see the XR messages urging us to put people from marginalized groups in positions of power and to feel their hypocrisy.

There are a very few people of color in our local group as well and none of them have significant roles. I don’t know them well enough to discuss the reasons why personally. But the fact is that our group has the option of putting people with disabilities or people of color in visible and/or powerful roles and it doesn’t. In fact, it has barred a person with a disability from national roles, based on symptoms of the disability and post-traumatic responses to social exclusion.

We’ve got a problem.

And I—like many other rebels from marginalized groups—now have to decide day by day if I stay and fight for the soul of this movement I believe holds our best chance for the future or if I let it go and take care of myself.